Wednesday, February 26, 2025
(in North America and South America)
Thursday, February 27, 2025
(outside of North American and South America)
©2024 University of Waterloo
Evaluating following order of operations, we get \(2-0+2\times5=2-0+10=12\).
Answer: (D)
Reading from the graph, \(20\%\)
of the students surveyed chose Friday.
Since \(3000\) students were surveyed,
the number of students who chose Friday as their favourite day of the
week was \(\dfrac{20}{100}\times3000=20\times30=600\).
Answer: (B)
The integer values of \(x\) that satisfy the inequality \(2<x<14\) are the integers between \(3\) and \(13\), inclusive, and so there are \(13-3+1=11\) such integers.
Answer: (E)
Alfonzo is paid \(\$14\) of the
\(\$50\). Together, Rachel and
Christophe are paid \(\$50-\$14=\$36\).
Rachel is paid twice what Christophe is paid, and so Rachel is paid
\(\frac23\) of \(\$36\) and Christophe is paid \(\frac13\) of \(\$36\).
Thus, Christophe is paid \(\frac13\times\$36=\$12\).
Answer: (B)
Solution 1:
We begin by placing \(U\) and \(V\) at the intersection of the gridlines
shown.
(You should confirm for yourself why \(U\) and \(V\) lie on \(PQ\) and \(RS\), respectively.)
Each of the line segments \(PU\),
\(UQ\), \(QR\), \(RV\), \(VS\), \(SP\), and \(UV\) is a diagonal of a \(1\times1\) square, and thus divides the
square into two triangles having equal areas.
Rectangle \(PQRS\) contains 8 such
triangles, each with area \(\frac12\times1\times1=\frac12\), and so the
area of \(PQRS\) is \(8\times\frac12=4\).
Solution 2:
We begin by constructing right-angled \(\triangle STR\), as shown.
By the Pythagorean Theorem, \(SR^2=ST^2+TR^2=2^2+2^2=8\), and so \(SR=\sqrt8\) (since \(ST>0\)).
Similarly, \(QR^2=1^2+1^2=2\), and so
\(QR=\sqrt2\) (since \(QR>0\)).
The area of rectangle \(PQRS\) is \(SR\times QR=\sqrt8\times
\sqrt2=\sqrt{16}=4\).
Answer: (C)
Since \(\sqrt{2025}=45\), the
next largest perfect square greater than 2025 is \(46^2=2116\).
Thus, the smallest possible value of \(n\) is \(2116-2025=91\).
Answer: (E)
The correct answer is \(13\).
Why?
Since the scoring areas \(10\) and
\(5\) are each multiples of \(5\), then any combination of these two
scores is also a multiple of \(5\).
The closest multiple of \(5\) less than
\(13\) is \(10\), and so to obtain a total score of
\(13\), a minimum of three arrows must
each score \(1\) point (since \(13-10=3\)).
However, at least one arrow is needed to score \(10\) points, and so at least four arrows
are needed to score \(13\)
points.
We confirm that each of the remaining answers is possible since \(16=10+5+1\), \(11=5+5+1\), \(7=5+1+1\), and \(20=10+5+5\).
Answer: (C)
Since \(15\) integers have an
average of \(18\), then the sum of
these \(15\) integers is \(15\times18=270\).
Since \(5\) of these integers have an
average of \(12\), then the sum of
these \(5\) integers is \(5\times12=60\).
Thus the sum of the other \(10\)
integers is \(270-60=210\), and so
their average is \(\dfrac{210}{10}=21\).
Answer: (B)
Solution 1:
Factoring the left side of the equation \(x^2-y^2=72\) gives \((x-y)(x+y)=72\).
Substituting \(x-y=12\) into this
equation, we get \(12(x+y)=72\), and so
\(x+y=\dfrac{72}{12}=6\).
Solution 2:
Solving the system of equations, we substitute the second equation
\(x=12+y\) into the first equation
\(x^2-y^2=72\) to get \((12+y)^2-y^2=72\).
Solving, we have \(144+24y+y^2-y^2=72\)
or \(24y=-72\), and so \(y=\dfrac{-72}{24}=-3\).
Since \(x=12+y=12-3=9\), then \(x+y=9-3=6\).
Answer: (E)
There are \(50\) groups, and so
\(m+n=50\). There are \(186\) students, and so \(3m+4n=186\).
Solving the system of equations, we substitute the first equation \(m=50-n\) into the second equation \(3m+4n=186\) to get \(3(50-n)+4n=186\).
Solving, we have \(150-3n+4n=186\) or
\(n=186-150=36\).
Since \(m=50-n=50-36=14\), then \(m-n=14-36=-22\).
Answer: (A)
In the chart that follows, we number the lightbulbs \(1\) to \(12\) and represent those that are on with a \(1\) and those that are off with a \(0\).
\(\boldsymbol{1}\) | \(\boldsymbol{2}\) | \(\boldsymbol{3}\) | \(\boldsymbol{4}\) | \(\boldsymbol{5}\) | \(\boldsymbol{6}\) | \(\boldsymbol{7}\) | \(\boldsymbol{8}\) | \(\boldsymbol{9}\) | \(\boldsymbol{10}\) | \(\boldsymbol{11}\) | \(\boldsymbol{12}\) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
At the start (all lightbulbs are off): | \(0\) | \(0\) | \(0\) | \(0\) | \(0\) | \(0\) | \(0\) | \(0\) | \(0\) | \(0\) | \(0\) | \(0\) |
After Angie flips every 2nd switch: | \(0\) | \(1\) | \(0\) | \(1\) | \(0\) | \(1\) | \(0\) | \(1\) | \(0\) | \(1\) | \(0\) | \(1\) |
After Bilal flips every 3rd switch: | \(0\) | \(1\) | \(1\) | \(1\) | \(0\) | \(0\) | \(0\) | \(1\) | \(1\) | \(1\) | \(0\) | \(0\) |
After Chenxhui flips every 4th switch: | \(0\) | \(1\) | \(1\) | \(0\) | \(0\) | \(0\) | \(0\) | \(0\) | \(1\) | \(1\) | \(0\) | \(1\) |
At the end of the process, the lightbulbs numbered \(2\), \(3\), \(9\), \(10\), and \(12\) are on, and so \(5\) lightbulbs are on.
Answer: (A)
The vertical axis represents money earned (in dollars) and the
horizontal axis represents time (in hours).
Thus, each employee’s money earned per hour is the slope of the line
segment from the origin \((0,0)\) to
the employee’s letter.
The employee who was paid the most money per hour is the employee
whose line segment has the greatest slope.
The line segment with the greatest slope is the steepest of the \(5\) line segments, and so Employee \(A\) was paid the most money per hour.
Alternately, we could add numbers to each of the axes and use them to
determine the slope of each line, and thus the money earned per hour for
each employee.
Answer: (A)
Since the equation is true for all real numbers \(x\), it is true for \(x=0\).
Substituting \(x=0\), we get \((0+2)(0+t)=0^2+b(0)+12\) or \(2t=12\), and so \(t=6\).
The equation becomes \((x+2)(x+6)=x^2+bx+12\) or \(x^2+8x+12=x^2+bx+12\), and so \(b=8\).
Answer: (B)
Each minute time moves forward, the volume of the substance
doubles, and thus each minute time moves backward, the volume is
halved.
The container was full at 9:20 a.m., and so it was half full at 9:19
a.m., and one-quarter full at 9:18 a.m.
Answer: (E)
Suppose the smallest number that is divisible by \(12\), \(13\), \(14\) and \(15\) is \(N\).
Each number that is divisible by \(12\)
has factors \(3\) and \(4\), since \(3\times4=12\) and \(3\) and \(4\) have no factors in common.
Similarly, each number that is divisible by \(14\) has factors \(2\) and \(7\).
However, \(N\) must have a factor of
\(4\) and thus it has a factor of \(2\).
\(N\) is divisible by \(15=3\times5\) and so \(5\) is also a factor of \(N\) (\(3\)
was previously included).
The prime number \(13\) is also a
factor of \(N\).
The factors of \(N\) are \(3\), \(4\), \(7\), \(5\), and \(13\), and so \(N=3\times4\times7\times5\times13=5460\)
(this is the lowest common multiple of \(12\), \(13\), \(14\) and \(15\)).
The smallest five-digit number that is divisible by \(12\), \(13\), \(14\) and \(15\), is the smallest integer multiple of
\(N\) that is greater than or equal to
\(10\,000\).
The smallest integer multiple of \(N\)
that is greater than or equal to \(10\,000\) is \(2N=2\times5460=10\,920\).
The hundreds digit of the smallest five-digit number that is divisible
by \(12\), \(13\), \(14\) and \(15\) is \(9\).
Answer: (D)
Suppose the midpoints of \(AD\)
and \(BC\) are \(P\) and \(Q\), respectively.
Join \(P\) to \(Q\) and label the intersection of \(PQ\) with each circle \(S\) and \(T\), as shown.
Since \(AD=BC\), the semi-circles
have equal diameters, and thus equal radii, \(r\), and so \(AP=PD=PS=BQ=QC=TQ=r\).
The shortest distance between the two semi-circles is \(ST=2\), and so \(ABCD\) has dimensions \(AD=2r\) and \(AB=PQ=2r+2\).
The area of \(ABCD\) is \(AD\times AB=2r(2r+2)=224\).
Solving this equation, we get \[\begin{align*}
2r(2r+2)&=224\\
4r^2+4r&=224\\
r^2+r-56&=0\\
(r+8)(r-7)&=0\end{align*}\] and so \(r=7\) (since \(r>0\)). The area of the shaded region is
the difference between the area of \(ABCD\) and the combined areas of the two
semi-circles, or \(224-\left(2\cdot\dfrac12\pi7^2\right)\approx
70\).
Answer: (E)
The probability that Francesca wins her first game is equal to
the probability that she plays either Dominique or Estella and wins,
added to the probability that she plays any of the other \(5\) players and wins.
It is equally likely that Francesca plays her first game against any of
the other \(7\) players, and so the
probability that she plays against either Dominique or Estella is \(\dfrac27\).
The probability that she wins her first game when playing either of
these two players is \(\dfrac25\), and
so the probability that she plays her first match against Dominique or
Estella and wins is \(\dfrac27\times\dfrac25=\dfrac{4}{35}\).
The probability that Francesca plays her first game against any of the
other \(5\) players is \(\dfrac57\).
The probability that she wins her first game when playing any of the
other \(5\) players is \(\dfrac34\), and so the probability that she
plays her first match against any of the other \(5\) players and wins is \(\dfrac57\times\dfrac34=\dfrac{15}{28}\).
Thus, the probability that Francesca wins her first match is \(\dfrac{4}{35}+\dfrac{15}{28}=\dfrac{16}{140}+\dfrac{75}{140}=\dfrac{91}{140}=\dfrac{13}{20}\).
Answer: (D)
When Arturo finishes the race, he is \(200 \text{ m}\) ahead of Morgan and \(290 \text{ m}\) ahead of Henri.
This means that Morgan runs \(2000 \text{ m} -
200 \text{ m}=1800 \text{ m}\) in the same amount of time that it
takes Henri to run \(2000 \text{ m} - 290
\text{ m}=1710 \text{ m}\).
If they each continue at their same speeds, Morgan runs the last \(\dfrac{1800 \text{ m}}{9}=200 \text{ m}\)
of the race in the same amount of time that Henri runs \(\dfrac{1710 \text{ m}}{9}=190 \text{
m}\).
Therefore, Morgan completes the \(1800 \text{
m} + 200 \text{ m}=2000 \text{ m}\) race in the same amount of
time that Henri runs \(1710 \text{ m} + 190
\text{ m}=1900 \text{ m}\). Morgan finishes the race 100 m ahead
of Henri.
Answer: (B)
Let \(A\) and \(B\) be the points at which the line with equation \(y=mx+7\) intersects the lines with equations \(y=0\) and \(y=2\), respectively. Also, suppose \(C\) has coordinates \((0,2)\) and \(D\) has coordinates \((0,0)\). The trapezoid in the problem is \(ABCD\), as shown.
We can find the coordinates of \(A\)
and \(B\) in terms of \(m\).
To find the coordinates of \(A\), we
find the point of intersection of the line with equation \(y=mx+7\) and the line with equation \(y=0\). Setting \(0=mx+7\), we get \(x=-\dfrac{7}{m}\). Note that the \(y\)-coordinate of \(A\) must be \(0\) since it is, by definition, on the line
with equation \(y=0\).
Therefore, the coordinates of \(A\) are
\(\left(-\dfrac{7}{m},0\right)\).
Similarly, the coordinates of \(B\) are
\(\left(-\dfrac{5}{m},2\right)\).
Trapezoid \(ABCD\) has parallel bases
\(AD\) and \(BC\) and height \(CD\).
The two bases are horizontal and have lengths \(AD=\dfrac{7}{m}\) and \(BC=\dfrac{5}{m}\). The length of \(CD\) is \(2\).
Therefore, the area of \(ABCD\) is
\(\dfrac{1}{2}\cdot
CD\cdot(AD+BC)=\dfrac{1}{2}\cdot
2\cdot\left(\dfrac{7}{m}+\dfrac{5}{m}\right)=\dfrac{12}{m}\).
It is given that the area of the trapezoid is \(3\), so we have \(\dfrac{12}{m}=3\), or \(m=4\).
Answer: (C)
There are no 2-digit integers with the given property. This is because the product of the digits of a 2-digit number is at most \(9\times 9 = 81 < 200\).
Observe that \(200=2^3\times 5^2\).
We are essentially looking for products of \(3\), \(4\), or \(5\) digits that equal \(200\).
The only digit that is a multiple of \(5\) is \(5\) itself, so no matter how many digits
\(m\) has, exactly two of its digits
must be \(5\).
The number of 3-digit numbers \(m\)
with the given property is \(3\), since
if two of the digits are \(5\), the
third must be \(8\). There are three
3-digit numbers with one digit equal to \(8\) and two digits equal to \(5\). They are \(558\), \(585\), and \(855\).
If \(m\) has four digits, then two
digits are \(5\) and the other two
digits have a product of \(8\).
The only ways to express \(8\) as a
product of two integers is \(8=2\times
4\) and \(8=1\times 8\).
In either case, there are six ways to choose where the two digits equal
to \(5\) go. They are
\(55\underline{\ \ }\,\underline{\ \ }\)
\(5\underline{\ \ }5\underline{\ \ }\)
\(5\underline{\ \ }\,\underline{\ \ }5\)
\(\underline{\ \ }55\underline{\ \ }\)
\(\underline{\ \ }5\underline{\ \ }5\)
\(\underline{\ \ }\,\underline{\ \ }55\)
In each of these \(6\) cases, there are \(2\) ways to place the remaining digits. There are also two choices for the remaining two digits (\(2\) and \(4\) or \(1\) and \(8\)), so the number of \(4\)-digit numbers with the given property is \(6\times2\times2=24\).
Using a similar method of counting, we conclude that if \(m\) has \(5\) digits, then there are \(10\) ways to place the two digits that are
equal to \(5\).
The remaining three digits must have a product of \(8\), so they must be \(1\), \(1\), and \(8\) or \(1\), \(2\), and \(4\) or \(2\), \(2\), and \(2\).
If the remaining digits are \(1\),
\(1\), and \(8\), then there are \(3\) choices of where to place the remaining
digits. This is because once the \(8\)
is placed, the last two digits must be \(1\) (there is no choices).
If the remaining digits are \(1\),
\(2\), and \(4\), then there are \(6\) ways to place the remaining digits.
This is because there are \(6\) ways to
order the digits \(1\), \(2\), and \(4\).
Finally, if the remaining digits are all \(2\), then there is only one way to place
the digits.
Thus, there are \(3\times10+6\times10+10=100\) \(5\)-digit numbers with the given
property.
The total number of integers \(m\) with \(1<m<100\,000\) with the property that the product of the digits is \(200\) is \(3+24+100=127\). The integer formed by the rightmost \(2\) digits of \(N\) is \(27\).
Answer: (B)
In a right-angled triangle, the hypotenuse is always the longest
side. Hence, the hypotenuse has length \(c
\text{ cm}\).
The other two lengths, \(a\text{ cm}\)
and \(b\text{ cm}\), are the lengths of
the legs. Therefore, the area of the triangle is \(\dfrac{1}{2}ab\text{ cm}^{2}\).
The area is given to be \(54\text{
cm}^{2}\), and so \(\dfrac{1}{2}ab=54\) or \(ab=108\).
Since \(a\) and \(b\) are integers, \(a\) and \(b\) must form a factor pair of \(108\). We are also given that \(a<b\), so the only possibilities for the
pair \((a,b)\) are \((1,108)\), \((2,54)\), \((3,36)\), \((4,27)\), \((6,18)\), and \((9,12)\).
Using the Pythagorean Theorem, we must also have that \(c=\sqrt{a^2+b^2}\).
Observe that \[\begin{align*}
\sqrt{1^2+108^2} &\approx 108.00463 \\
\sqrt{2^2+54^2} &\approx 54.037 \\
\sqrt{3^2+36^2} &\approx 36.1248 \\
\sqrt{4^2+27^2} &\approx 27.2947 \\
\sqrt{6^2+18^2} &\approx 18.9737 \\
\sqrt{9^2+12^2} &= 15\end{align*}\] and so the only possible
pair \((a,b)\) that leads to an integer
value of \(c\) is \(a=9\) and \(b=12\), so it must be true that \(c=15\).
Answer: \(15\)
We will begin by making the substitution \(A=2^x\), \(B=2^y\), and \(C=3^z\).
With these substitutions, the three equations become \[\begin{align*}
A+B+\frac{1}{3}C &= 2259 \tag{1} \\
AB+C &= 7073 \tag{2} \\
A+B+C &= 6633 \tag{3}\end{align*}\] Subtracting Equation
\((1)\) from Equation \((3)\) gives \(\dfrac{2}{3}C = 6633-2259 = 4374\).
Hence, \(C=\dfrac{3}{2}\cdot4374=6561\).
Substituting \(C=6561\) into Equation
\((2)\) gives \(AB+6561 = 7073\) or \(AB=512\).
Substituting \(C=6561\) into Equation
\((3)\) gives \(A+B+6561=6633\) or \(A+B=72\).
Multiplying both sides of \(A+B=72\) by
\(A\) (since \(A\neq0\)) gives \(A^2+AB=72A\), into which we can substitute
\(AB=512\) to get \(A^2+512=72A\).
Rearranging gives \(A^2-72A+512=0\)
which can be factored to get \((A-64)(A-8)=0\).
If \(A=64\), then either \(AB=512\) or \(A+B=72\) can be used to deduce that \(B=8\), and if \(A=8\), then we could similarly deduce that
\(B=64\).
Thus, we have that \(A\) and \(B\) are \(8\) and \(64\), but we cannot determine the order.
Since \(64=2^6\) and \(8=2^3\), we conclude that \(x\) and \(y\) are \(6\) and \(3\), though we cannot determine with
certainty which is which.
Returning to \(C=6561\), we have \(3^z=6561=3^8\) so \(z=8\).
Regardless of which of \(x\) and \(y\) is \(8\) and which is \(64\), we get that \(xyz=3\times6\times8=144\). The integer
formed by the rightmost two digits of \(144\) is \(44\).
Answer: \(44\)
Let \(x\) be the number of
minutes that it would take the bigger ant to build an anthill alone and
let \(y\) be the number of minutes that
it would take the smaller ant to build an anthill alone.
Since the bigger ant can build an anthill in \(x\) minutes, the bigger ant builds \(\dfrac{1}{x}\) anthills per minute.
Likewise, the smaller ant can build \(\dfrac{1}{y}\) anthills per minute.
Thus, working together, the two ants build \(\dfrac{1}{x}+\dfrac{1}{y}\) anthills per
minute.
It is also given that it takes the two ants \(24\) minutes to build an anthill together,
so this means they build \(\dfrac{1}{24}\) anthills per minute working
together.
Hence, we get the equation \(\dfrac{1}{x}+\dfrac{1}{y}=\dfrac{1}{24}\).
Multiplying this equation through by \(24xy\) gives \(24y+24x=xy\).
From the other given condition, we get \(x=y-14\), so we can substitute to get \(24y+24(y-14) = (y-14)y\).
Expanding and rearranging, this equation becomes \(y^2-62y+336=0\), which can be factored as
\((y-56)(y-6)=0\).
If \(y=6\), then \(x=-8\), which does not make sense since
\(x\) must be positive. Therefore,
\(y=56\).
Answer: \(56\)
Consider the function \(g(x)=59x\). Observe that \(g(1)=59\), \(g(2)=118\), and \(g(3)=177\), from which it follows that
\(f(1)=g(1)\), \(f(2)=g(2)\), and \(f(3)=g(3)\).
Now define a polynomial \(h(x)=f(x)-g(x)\) so that, by construction,
\(x=1\), \(x=2\), and \(x=3\) are roots of \(h(x)\).
Algebraically, we also have that \[h(x) =
f(x)-g(x) = x^4+px^3+qx^2+rx+s - 59x = x^4 + px^3 + qx^2 +
(r-59)x+s\] but the important thing to notice here is that \(h(x)\) is a degree four polynomial with a
leading coefficient of \(1\).
Since we already know that \(x=1\),
\(x=2\), and \(x=3\) are roots of \(h(x)\), we conclude that \[h(x)=(x-1)(x-2)(x-3)k(x)\] for some
polynomial \(k(x)\). However, because
\(h(x)\) has degree \(4\) and a leading coefficient of \(1\), it must be true that \(k(x)\) has degree \(1\) and a leading coefficient of \(1\).
Thus, \(h(x) = (x-1)(x-2)(x-3)(x-a)\)
for some real number \(a\).
We now evaluate \(h(x)\) at \(x=9\) and \(x=-5\) to get \[\begin{align*}
h(9) &= (9-1)(9-2)(9-3)(9-a) = 336(9-a) \\
h(-5) &= (-5-1)(-5-2)(-5-3)(-5-a) = 336(5+a)\end{align*}\]
Now using that \(h(x) = f(x)-g(x)\) or
\(f(x) = h(x)+g(x)\), we can determine
the value of \(f(9)+f(-5)\) as follows:
\[\begin{align*}
f(9) + f(-5) &= h(9)+g(9) + h(-5)+g(-5) \\
&= 336(9-a) + 9(59) + 336(5+a) -5(59) \\
&= 336(9)-336a+9(59)+336(5)+336a-5(59) \\
&= 336(9+5)+59(9-5) \\
&= 336(14)+59(4) \\
&= 4940\end{align*}\] Therefore, \(T=4940\), so the answer is \(4+9+4+0=17\).
Answer: \(17\)
We will take for granted the following fact: For integers \(a\) and \(b\), \(b^2\) is divisible by \(a^2\) exactly when \(b\) is divisible by \(a\). Noting that \(2025=45^2\), we can apply this to get that \((a_k)^2\) is divisible by \(2025\) exactly when \(a_k\) is divisible by \(45\). Therefore, we really want to determine the number of \(k\) with \(1\leq k\leq 2025\) such that \(a_k\) is divisible by \(45\).
Since \(45=5\times 9\) and \(5\) and \(9\) share no common prime divisors, we get
that \(a_k\) is divisible by \(45\) exactly when it is divisible by both
\(5\) and \(9\).
Consider the following three claims about the integers in the
sequence.
Claim 1: \(a_k\) is divisible by \(5\) exactly when \(k\) is \(4\) more than a multiple of \(5\).
Claim 2: \(a_k\) is divisible by \(9\) exactly when \(k\) is \(10\) more than a multiple of \(12\).
Claim 3: \(a_k\) is divisible by \(45\) exactly when \(k\) is \(34\) more than a multiple of \(60\).
The rest of the solution will be structured as follows:
Prove Claim 3 assuming Claims 1 and 2.
Answer the question using Claim 3.
Prove Claims 1 and 2.
Proof of Claim 3 from Claims 1 and 2:
One can check that \(34\) is the smallest positive integer that is both \(4\) more than a multiple of \(5\) and \(10\) more than a multiple of \(12\). By Claims 1 and 2, \(a_{34}\) is divisible by \(45\).
Claim 1 implies that the multiples of \(5\) in the sequence appear every \(5\) terms after \(a_{34}\), so at \(a_k\) for \(k=39\), \(k=44\), and so on.
Claim 2 implies that the multiples of \(9\) in the sequence appear every \(12\) terms after \(a_{34}\), so at \(a_k\) for \(k=46\), \(k=58\), and so on.
The least common multiple of \(5\) and \(12\) is \(60\), and so the integers in the sequence that are both multiples of \(5\) and \(9\) occur every \(60\) terms after \(a_{34}\).
Therefore, the terms in the sequence that are multiples of \(45\) are exactly those of the form \(a_k\) where \(k\) is \(34\) more than a multiple of \(60\).
To answer the question, we count the non-negative integers \(m\) such that \(1\leq 60m+34\leq 2025\). Rearranging, we
get \(-33 \leq 60m \leq 1991\), and
after dividing through by \(34\), we
get \(-\dfrac{33}{60} \leq m \leq
\dfrac{1991}{60}\).
Since \(m\) is non-negative and \(\dfrac{1991}{60}\approx 33.18\), we
conclude that \(m\) can be any of the
integers from \(0\) through \(33\) inclusive, of which there are \(34\).
The answer to the question is \(34\).
Finally we will prove Claims 1 and 2.
Proof of Claim 1: \(a_k\) is divisible by \(5\) exactly when \(k\) is \(4\) more than a multiple of \(5\).
Suppose two consecutive terms in the sequence, \(a_n\) and \(a_{n+1}\), are both multiples of \(5\). That is, suppose \(a_n=5x\) and \(a_{n+1}=5y\) for some integers \(x\) and \(y\).
Then \(a_{n+2}=a_n-a_{n+1}=5x-5y=5(x-y)\) is a multiple of \(5\) as well.
Similarly, \(a_{n+1}=a_{n-1}-a_n\), which can be rearranged to get \(a_{n-1}=a_n+a_{n+1}=5x+5y=5(x+y)\), which is also a multiple of \(5\).
We have shown that if two consecutive terms in the sequence are multiples of \(5\), then so is the term after them and the term before them.
This reasoning can be followed to conclude that every term in the sequence must be a multiple of \(5\).
Not every term in the sequence is a multiple of \(5\) (for example, \(a_1=1\) is not a multiple of \(5\)), so we conclude that there cannot be two consecutive terms in the sequence that are both multiples of \(5\).
By very similar reasoning, it can be shown that if both \(a_n\) and \(a_{n+2}\) are multiples of \(5\) (two terms that are two apart in the sequence), then every term in the sequence must be a multiple of \(5\).
Hence, we conclude that any two multiples of \(5\) in the sequence must have a minimum of two terms strictly between them.
Now consider two consecutive terms \(a_n\) and \(a_{n+1}\). We can use the recursive definition to compute the next few integers in the sequence in terms of \(a_n\) and \(a_{n+1}\) as follows. \[\begin{align*} a_{n+2} &= -a_{n+1}+a_n \\ a_{n+3} &= -a_{n+2}+a_{n+1} \\ &= -(-a_{n+1}+a_n)+a_{n+1} \\ &= 2a_{n+1}-a_n \\ a_{n+4} &= -a_{n+3}+a_{n+2} \\ &= -(2a_{n+1}-a_n) -a_{n+1}+a_n \\ &= -3a_{n+1}+2a_n \\ a_{n+5} &= -a_{n+4} + a_{n+3} \\ &= -(-3a_{n+1}+2a_n) +2a_{n+1}-a_n \\ &= 5a_{n+1}-3a_n\end{align*}\] If we assume that \(a_n\) is a multiple of \(5\), then \(a_{n+5}=5a_{n+1}-3a_n\) is also a multiple of \(5\). Moreover, there cannot be any multiples of \(5\) in the sequence between these two multiples of \(5\) because it would cause there to be two multiples of \(5\) at most \(1\) term apart.
Computing the first few terms of the sequence, we get \(a_1=1\) and \(a_2=3\), \(a_3=-3+1=-2\) and \(a_4=-a_3+a_2=2+3=5\), and so \(a_4\) is divisible by \(5\).
From the above argument, \(a_{4+5m}\) is divisible by \(5\) for all positive integers \(m\), and there are no other \(k\) for which \(a_k\) is divisible by \(5\).
Proof of Claim 2: \(a_k\) is divisible by \(9\) exactly when \(k\) is \(10\) more than a multiple of \(12\).
By nearly identical reasoning to the proof of Claim 1, it can be shown that the terms in the sequence that are multiples of \(3\) occur every \(4\) terms. We will take this for granted in this proof.
Continuing to compute the first few terms of the sequence, we get \[1,3,-2,5,-7,12,-19,31,-50,81\] and so we see that \(81=a_{10}\) is the first multiple of \(9\).
Continuing from where we left off in the proof of Claim 1, we can, assuming that \(a_n\) and \(a_{n+1}\) are consecutive terms in the sequence, compute the terms \(a_{n+2}\) through \(a_{n+12}\) in terms of \(a_n\) and \(a_{n+1}\). When doing this, we get the following. \[\begin{align*} a_{n+2} &= -a_{n+1}+a_n \\ a_{n+3} &= 2a_{n+1}-a_n \\ a_{n+4} &= -3a_{n+1}+2a_n \\ a_{n+5} &= 5a_{n+1}-3a_n \\ a_{n+6} &= -8a_{n+1}+5a_n \\ a_{n+7} &= 13a_{n+1}-8a_n \\ a_{n+8} &= -21a_{n+1}+13a_n \\ a_{n+9} &= 34a_{n+1}-21a_n \\ a_{n+10} &= -55a_{n+1}+34a_n \\ a_{n+11} &= 89a_{n+1}-55a_n \\ a_{n+12} &= -144a_{n+1}+89a_n\end{align*}\] Now if \(a_n\) is a multiple of \(9\), then so is \(a_{n+12}=-144a_{n+1}+89a_n\) since \(144\) is a multiple of \(9\).
Given that \(a_{10}\) is a multiple of \(9\), this shows that \(a_{10+12m}\) is a multiple of \(9\) for all positive integers \(m\), as well.
It remains to verify that there are no other multiples of \(9\) in the sequence.
Suppose there is some other multiple of \(9\). Then there is some \(n\) such that \(a_n\) is a multiple of \(9\) and \(a_{n+k}\) is a multiple of \(9\) for some \(k\) with \(0<k<12\).
A multiple of \(9\) must be a multiple of \(3\), so from what was claimed at the beginning of the proof, we must have that either \(a_{n+4}\) or \(a_{n+8}\) is a multiple of \(9\).
If \(a_{n+4}\) is a multiple of \(9\), then \(-3a_{n+1}+2a_n\) is a multiple of \(9\). If both \(a_n\) and \(-3a_{n+1}+2a_n\) are multiples of \(9\), then so is \(-3a_{n+1}\), which means \(a_{n+1}\) is a multiple of \(3\).
Thus, we must have that \(a_n\) and \(a_{n+1}\) are both multiples of \(3\). By reasoning used earlier, this would imply that every term in the sequence is a multiple of \(3\), which is not true.
Therefore, \(a_{n+4}\) is not a multiple of \(9\). A similar argument shows that \(a_{n+8}\) is not a multiple of \(9\).
Answer: \(34\)