Wednesday, April 2, 2025
(in North America and South America)
Thursday, April 3, 2025
(outside of North American and South America)
©2025 University of Waterloo
Since \(4(x-2) = 2(x-4)\), then \(4x - 8 = 2x - 8\) which gives \(2x = 0\) and so \(x=0\).
Solution 1:
If \(2x = 9\), then \(6x = 3 \cdot 2x = 3 \cdot 9 = 27\).
This means that \(2^{6x-23} = 2^{27 - 23} =
2^4 = 16\).
Solution 2:
If \(2x = 9\), then \(x = \frac{9}{2}\).
Therefore, \(6x - 23 = 6 \cdot \tfrac{9}{2} -
23 = 27 - 23 = 4\).
Thus, \(2^{6x - 23} = 2^4 =
16\).
Equating expressions for \(y\),
we obtain \(3x + 7 = 7x + 3\), which
gives \(4 = 4x\) and so \(x = 1\).
Since \(x = 1\), then \(y = 3x + 7 = 3 + 7 = 10\), and so the point
of intersection has coordinates \((1,
10)\).
Since \(3 < \sqrt{k^2+4} <
4\), then \(3^2 < k^2 + 4 <
4^2\). (We can square each part and preserve the direction of the
inequalities since each part is positive.)
Therefore, \(9 < k^2 + 4 < 16\)
and so \(5 < k^2 < 12\).
Since \(k\) is a positive integer whose
square is between 5 and 12, then \(k =
3\).
Let \(S\) be the sum of the 20
smallest odd positive integers.
Then \(S = 1 + 3 + 5 + \cdots + 35 + 37 +
39\).
(Note that the smallest odd positive integer is 1 and the 20th integer
in this list must be \(19 \cdot 2 =
38\) greater than the 1st integer.)
If we rewrite the terms of \(S\) in
reverse order, we obtain \(S = 39 + 37 + 35 +
\cdots + 5 + 3 + 1\).
Adding these two representations, we obtain \[2S = 40 + 40 + 40 + \cdots + 40 + 40 +
40\] There are 20 terms in this sum because there were 20 terms
in each of the sums. Each term in this sum equals 40 because the first
pair adds to 40 and each subsequent pair has one number increased by 2
and one number decreased by 2, which means that the sum does not
change.
Therefore, \(2S = 20 \cdot 40 = 800\)
and so the sum of the 20 smallest odd integers is \(400\).
Since \(\triangle ABF\) is
right-angled at \(A\), then by the
Pythagorean Theorem, \[BF^2 = AB^2 + FA^2 =
16^2 + 13^2 = 256 + 169 = 425\] Since \(\triangle BDF\) is equilateral, then \(BD = DF = BF\) and so \(BD^2 = DF^2 = BF^2 = 425\).
Since \(\triangle BCD\) is right-angled
at \(C\), then \(BC^2 + CD^2 = BD^2 = 425\).
Since \(BC = 8\), then \(8^2 + CD^2 = 425\) which gives \(CD^2 = 361\).
Since \(CD > 0\), then \(CD = \sqrt{361} = 19\).
Since \(\triangle DEF\) is right-angled
at \(E\), then \(DE^2 + EF^2 = DF^2 = 425\).
Since \(DE = 5\), then \(5^2 + EF^2 = 425\) which gives \(EF^2 = 400\).
Since \(EF > 0\), then \(EF = \sqrt{400} = 20\).
Therefore, the perimeter of \(ABCDEF\)
is \(AB + BC + CD + DE + EF + FA\),
which equals \(16 + 8 + 19 + 5 + 20 +
13\) or \(81\).
Solution 1:
Since \(p + q = 5\) and \(q + r = 9\), then \(p + q + q + r = 5 + 9\) or \(p + 2q + r = 14\).
Since \(p + 2q + r = 14\) and \(p + q + r = 18\), then subtracting the two
equations gives \[(p+2q+r) - (p+q+r) = 14 -
18\] and so \(q = -4\).
Solution 2:
Since \(p + q + r = 18\) and \(p + q = 5\), then \(5 + r = 18\) and so \(r = 13\). Since \(q + r = 9\) and \(r = 13\), then \(q + 13 = 9\) and so \(q = -4\).
To find the \(x\)-intercept of
the line with equation \(6x + y = 24\),
we set \(y = 0\) to obtain \(6x = 24\) which gives \(x = 4\).
To find the \(y\)-intercept of the line
with equation \(6x + y = 24\), we set
\(x = 0\) to obtain \(y = 24\).
Since the parabola whose equation we want to determine has only one
\(x\)-intercept (namely \(x = 4\)), we can write its equation as
\(y = a(x-4)^2\) for some real number
\(a\).
Additionally, we know that the \(y\)-intercept of the parabola is \(y = 24\), so it passes through the point
\((0, 24)\).
Substituting \((x,y) = (0, 24)\) into
\(y = a(x-4)^2\), we obtain \(24 = a(0-4)^2\) which gives \(24 = 16a\) and so \(a = \frac{3}{2}\).
Therefore, an equation of the parabola is \(y
= \frac{3}{2}(x-4)^2\).
Since \(\dfrac{1}{2w} = \dfrac{1}{3y} =
\dfrac{1}{4z}\) and \(\dfrac{1}{2w} +
\dfrac{1}{3y} + \dfrac{1}{4z} = \dfrac{1}{24}\), then each of
\(\dfrac{1}{2w}\) and \(\dfrac{1}{3y}\) and \(\dfrac{1}{4z}\) is equal to one-third of
the total, which gives \(\dfrac{1}{2w} =
\dfrac{1}{3y} = \dfrac{1}{4z} = \dfrac{1}{3} \cdot \dfrac{1}{24} =
\dfrac{1}{72}\).
Therefore, \(2w = 3y = 4z = 72\) and so
\(w = 36\) and \(y = 24\) and \(z
= 18\).
Thus, \(w + y + z = 36 + 24 + 18 =
78\).
When a wheel on a bicycle makes \(1\) complete revolution, the bicycle moves
a distance forward equal to the circumference of the wheel.
The front wheel on Terry’s bicycle has a radius of \(15 \text{ cm}\), so its circumference is
\(2\pi \cdot (15\text{ cm}) = 30\pi\text{
cm}\).
The rear wheel on Terry’s bicycle has a radius of \(9 \text{ cm}\), so its circumference is
equal to \(2\pi \cdot (9\text{ cm}) =
18\pi\text{ cm}\).
After \(1\) complete revolution of the
front wheel, the total number of revolutions of the rear wheel is not a
whole number, since \(30\pi\) is not an
integer multiple of \(18\pi\).
After \(2\) complete revolutions of the
front wheel, the total number of revolutions of the rear wheel is not a
whole number, since \(60\pi\) is not an
integer multiple of \(18\pi\).
After \(3\) complete revolutions of the
front wheel, the rear wheel will have made \(5\) complete revolutions, since \(90\pi = 5 \cdot 18\pi\). (Note that \(90\) is the least common multiple of \(30\) and \(18\).)
Therefore, after Terry has travelled \(90\pi\text{ cm}\), both wheels have made a
whole number of revolutions for the first time.
Thus, the smallest possible value of \(d\) is \(d =
90\pi \approx 282.7\) which means that the integer closest to the
smallest possible value of \(d\) is
\(283\).
Solution 1:
Since \(ABCD\) is a rectangle, then
\(DC = AB = 24\) and \(\angle ADC = 90\degree\).
By the Pythagorean Theorem, \(AC^2 = AD^2 +
DC^2 = 18^2 + 24^2 = 324 + 576 = 900\).
Since \(AC>0\), then \(AC = \sqrt{900} = 30\).
Consider \(\triangle ADF\) and \(\triangle CEF\).
Since \(AD\) is parallel to \(BC\), then \(\angle DAF = \angle ECF\) and \(\angle ADF = \angle CEF\).
This means that \(\triangle ADF\) and
\(\triangle CEF\) are similar.
Since \(AD = 18\) and \(CE = 6\), then \(\dfrac{CF}{AF} = \dfrac{CE}{AD} =
\dfrac{6}{18}\).
This means that \(CF:AF = 1:3\).
Since \(AC = CF + AF = 30\), then \(CF = \frac{1}{4}AC = \frac{30}{4} =
\frac{15}{2}\).
Solution 2:
We put the diagram on a coordinate grid with \(D\) at the origin \((0,0)\), \(A\) on the positive \(y\)-axis, and \(C\) on the positive \(x\)-axis.
Since \(AD = 18\), then \(A\) has coordinates \((0, 18)\).
Since \(DC = AB = 24\), then \(C\) has coordinates \((24, 0)\).
Since \(BC\) is vertical and \(EC = 6\), then \(E\) has coordinates \((24, 6)\).
Line segment \(DE\) passes through the
origin and through \((24, 6)\) and so
has slope \(\frac{6}{24}\) which means
that its equation is \(y =
\frac{1}{4}x\).
Line segment \(AC\) passes through the
points \((0, 18)\) and \((24, 0)\).
Its slope is thus \(\frac{18 - 0}{0 - 24} =
-\frac{3}{4}\), which means that its equation is \(y = -\frac{3}{4}x + 18\).
Point \(F\) is the point of
intersection of line segments \(AC\)
and \(DE\).
Equating expressions for \(y\), we
obtain \(\frac{1}{4}x = -\frac{3}{4}x +
18\), which gives \(x =
18\).
Substituting into \(y = \frac{1}{4}x\),
we obtain \(y = \frac{18}{4} =
\frac{9}{2}\).
Thus, \(F\) has coordinates \(\left(18, \frac{9}{2}\right)\).
Finally, \[CF = \sqrt{(24 - 18)^2 + \left(0
- \tfrac{9}{2}\right)^2} = \sqrt{36 + \tfrac{81}{4}} =
\sqrt{\tfrac{225}{4}}\] and so \(CF =
\frac{15}{2}\).
Solution 1:
Since two of the numbers are \(20\)
and \(30\), and the third number is
between 1 and 40, inclusive, and the three numbers are different, then
there are 38 possible values for the third number. We call the value
chosen \(n\).
Since \(b < a\) and \(b < c\), then \(b\) is the smallest, so we set \(b\) equal to the smallest of 20, 30 and
\(n\).
There are then 2 choices for ordering the assignment of the two
remaining numbers to \(a\) and \(c\).
Therefore, there are \(38 \cdot 2 =
76\) possible combinations.
Solution 2:
From the given information, two of \(a\), \(b\) and \(c\) are equal to \(20\) and \(30\).
Suppose that \(a\) and \(b\) are \(20\) and \(30\) in some order.
Since \(b < a\), then \(b = 20\) and \(a
= 30\).
Additionally, we know that \(c > b =
20\), that \(c \leq 40\), and
that \(c \neq a = 30\).
This means that there are \(19\)
possible values for \(c\) in this case
(the integers from \(21\) to \(40\), inclusive, excluding \(30\)).
Thus, in this case, there are \(19\)
possible combinations.
Suppose that \(b\) and \(c\) are \(20\) and \(30\) in some order.
Since \(b < c\), then \(b = 20\) and \(c
= 30\).
Additionally, we know that \(a > b =
20\), that \(a \leq 40\), and
that \(a \neq c = 30\).
This means that there are \(19\)
possible values for \(a\) in this
case.
Thus, in this case, there are \(19\)
possible combinations.
Suppose that \(a\) and \(c\) are \(20\) and \(30\) in some order.
If \(a = 20\) and \(c = 30\), then we know that \(b < a = 20\) and \(b < c = 30\) (which means that \(b<20\)) and \(b \geq 1\). Here, the fact that the three
integers are different does not create additional restrictions.
There are \(19\) possible values for
\(b\) in this case (the integers from
\(1\) to \(19\), inclusive).
If \(a = 30\) and \(c = 20\), there will again be \(19\) possible values for \(b\).
Thus, in this case, there are \(19 + 19 =
38\) possible combinations.
In total, there are \(19 + 19 + 38 = 76\) possible combinations.
Using the fact that the values of the three given expressions
form a geometric sequence with no term equal to \(0\), the following equations are
equivalent: \[\begin{align*}
\dfrac{1 + \sin\theta}{2 - 2\cos\theta} & = \dfrac{2 +
2\cos\theta}{1 + \sin\theta} \\
(2 - 2 \cos\theta)(2 + 2\cos\theta) & = (1 + \sin\theta)^2 \\
4 - 4\cos^2\theta & = 1 + 2\sin\theta + \sin^2\theta \\
4(1 - \cos^2\theta) & = 1 + 2\sin\theta + \sin^2\theta \\
4\sin^2\theta & = 1 + 2\sin\theta + \sin^2\theta \\
3\sin^2\theta - 2\sin\theta - 1 & = 0 \\
(3\sin\theta + 1)(\sin\theta - 1) & = 0\end{align*}\] Thus,
\(\sin \theta = -\frac{1}{3}\) or \(\sin\theta = 1\).
Since \(\cos^2\theta = 1 -
\sin^2\theta\), then \(\cos^2 \theta =
1- (-\frac{1}{3})^2 = \frac{8}{9}\) or \(\cos^2\theta = 0\).
Therefore, the possible values of \(\cos\theta\) are \(\sqrt{\frac{8}{9}}\), \(-\sqrt{\frac{8}{9}}\), \(0\).
These can be re-written as \(\frac{2\sqrt{2}}{3}\), \(-\frac{2\sqrt{2}}{3}\), \(0\).
Note that \(\cos \theta = 0\) gives the
constant geometric sequence \(2\),
\(2\), \(2\).
Label the \(12\) points, in
order, as \(A\), \(B\), \(C\), \(D\), \(E\), \(F\), \(G\), \(H\), \(I\), \(J\), \(K\), and \(L\). Let the centre of the circle be \(O\).
Since the \(12\) points are equally spaced, then \(\angle AOB = \angle BOC = \cdots = \angle KOL =
\angle LOA\).
It will be helpful to consider the number of these \(12\) "gaps" between pairs of points. For
example, there are \(4\) gaps (counting
in a clockwise direction) between \(B\)
and \(F\).
In fact, if two pairs of points separated by the same number of gaps
are connected, the line segments have the same length. For example,
\(BF = DH\) since \(B\) and \(F\), and \(D\) and \(H\) are each separated by 4 gaps. This is
because, for example, \(\triangle BOF\)
is congruent to \(\triangle DOH\)
because \(BO = FO = DO = HO\) (all
radii) and \(\angle BOF = \angle
DOH\).
This means that we can characterize a triangle formed by \(3\) of the \(12\) points by the numbers of gaps formed
by each side of the triangle. For example, \(\triangle BDF\) is formed by \(2 + 2 + 8\) gaps, where each number of gaps
is counted moving clockwise around the circle. In particular, moving
clockwise around the circle \(\triangle
BDF\) has \(2\) gaps between
\(B\) and \(D\), 2 gaps between \(D\) and \(F\), and \(8\) gaps between \(F\) and \(D\).
Since the total number of gaps around the circle is \(12\), then triangles that have at least two
sides equal in length must be of the form \(1
+ 1 + 10\) (for example, \(\triangle
ABC\)), \(2 + 2 + 8\) (for
example, \(\triangle ACE\)), \(3 + 3 + 6\) (for example, \(\triangle ADG\)), \(4 + 4 + 4\) (for example, \(\triangle AEI\)), and \(5 + 5 + 2\) (for example, \(\triangle AFK\)).
There are \(12\) distinct positions for
each of the triangles characterized by \(1+1+10\), \(2+2+8\), \(3+3+6\), and \(5+5+2\). (Each of the example triangles
above can be rotated by \(1\) gap at a
time.)
Additionally, there are \(4\) positions
for the \(4+4+4\) triangle, namely
\(\triangle AEI\), \(\triangle BFJ\), \(\triangle CGK\), and \(\triangle DHL\). If we were to rotate \(\triangle DHL\) by another gap, we return
to \(\triangle AEI\).
In total, there are \(12 + 12 + 12 + 12 + 4 =
52\) ways in which \(3\) of the
\(12\) points can be chosen to form a
triangle with at least two sides of equal length.
Solution 1:
Join \(A\) to \(C\).
By the Pythagorean Theorem in \(\triangle ADC\), we obtain \[AC = \sqrt{AD^2 + CD^2} = \sqrt{52^2 + 39^2} = \sqrt{13^2(4^2 + 3^2)} = \sqrt{13^2}\sqrt{5^2} = 13 \cdot 5 = 65\] Thus, \[\begin{align*} \sin(\angle BAD) & = \sin(\angle BAC + \angle CAD) \\ & = \sin(\angle BAC)\cos(\angle CAD) + \cos(\angle BAC)\sin(\angle CAD) \\ & = \tfrac{33}{65}\cdot\tfrac{52}{65} + \tfrac{56}{65} \cdot \tfrac{39}{65} \\ & = \tfrac{33}{65}\cdot\tfrac{4}{5} + \tfrac{56}{65} \cdot \tfrac{3}{5} \\ & = \tfrac{300}{65 \cdot 5} \\ & = \tfrac{12}{13}\end{align*}\] Therefore, \(BP = AB \sin(\angle BAD) = 56 \cdot \frac{12}{13} = \frac{672}{13}\).
Solution 2:
Extend \(BC\) and \(AD\) to meet at point \(Q\).
Suppose that \(CQ = x\) and \(DQ = y\).
Then \(\triangle CDQ\) is similar to
\(\triangle ABQ\), since each is
right-angled and they share an angle at \(Q\).
Therefore, \(\dfrac{AB}{CD} = \dfrac{BQ}{DQ} =
\dfrac{AQ}{CQ}\) and so \(\dfrac{56}{39} = \dfrac{33 + x}{y} = \dfrac{52 +
y}{x}\).
This gives \(56y = 39x + 39 \cdot 33\)
and \(56x = 39y + 39 \cdot 52\).
Thus, \(-39x + 56y = 1287\) and \(56x - 39y = 2028\). Adding \(39\) times the first of these equations to
\(56\) times the second gives \[\begin{align*}
39(-39x + 56y) + 56(56x - 39y) & = 39\cdot 1287 + 56 \cdot 2028 \\
-39^2x + 39 \cdot 56 y + 56^2x - 56\cdot 39 y & = 163761 \\
1615x & = 163761 \\
x & = \dfrac{163761}{1615} = \dfrac{507}{5}\end{align*}\]
Now \(\triangle CDQ\) is also similar
to \(\triangle BPQ\), and so \(\dfrac{BP}{CD} = \dfrac{BQ}{CQ}\), which
gives \[BP = \dfrac{CD \cdot BQ}{CQ} =
\dfrac{39(33+x)}{x} = \dfrac{39 \cdot(33 +
\frac{507}{5})}{\frac{507}{5}} = \dfrac{5 \cdot (33 +
\frac{507}{5})}{13} = \dfrac{165 + 507}{13} =
\dfrac{672}{13}\]
Solution 3:
Let \(M\) be the point on \(BP\) co that \(CM\) is perpendicular to \(BP\).
Let \(BM = x\).
Since \(CMPD\) is a quadrilateral
with three right angles, it has four right angles and so is a
rectangle.
Thus, \(MP = CD = 39\) and \(PD = MC\).
By the Pythagorean Theorem in \(\triangle
BMC\), \(MC = \sqrt{33^2 -
x^2}\).
This means that \(AP = 52 - PD = 52 -
\sqrt{33^2 - x^2}\).
By the Pythagorean Theorem in \(\triangle
BPA\), \[\begin{align*}
AB^2 & = AP^2 + BP^2 \\
56^2 & = (52 - \sqrt{33^2 - x^2})^2 + (x + 39)^2 \\
56^2 & = 52^2 - 104\sqrt{33^2 - x^2} + 33^2 - x^2 + x^2 + 78x + 39^2
\\
104\sqrt{33^2 - x^2} & = 78x + 33^2 + 39^2 + 52^2 - 56^2 \\
104\sqrt{33^2 - x^2} & = 78x + 2178 \\
52\sqrt{33^2 - x^2} & = 39x + 1089 \\
52^2(33^2 - x^2) & = 1521x^2 + 84942x + 1185921 \\
0 & = 4225x^2 + 84942x - 1758735\end{align*}\] Using the
quadratic formula, \[x = \dfrac{-84942 \pm
\sqrt{84942^2 - 4(4225)(-1758735)}}{2 \cdot 4225} = \dfrac{-84892 \pm
192192}{8450}\] Since \(x>0\), then \(x = \dfrac{-84942 + 192192}{8450} =
\dfrac{107250}{8450} = \dfrac{2145}{169} = \dfrac{165}{13}\).
Therefore, \(BP = x + 39 = \dfrac{165}{13}
+ 39 = \dfrac{672}{13}\).
Let \(b = g^{-1}(a)\). Since
\(f^{-1}(b) = 3\), then \(b = f(3) = 4\).
Since \(g^{-1}(a) = b = 4\), then \(a= g(4) = 5\).
Solution 1:
The first equation can be rewritten as \((x
- 4y)^2 = 0\), from which we obtain \(x
- 4y = 0\) or \(x = 4y\).
The second equation can be rewritten as \((\log_{10}x + \log_{10}y)^2 = 4\), from
which we obtain \(\log_{10}x + \log_{10}y =
\pm 2\).
Using logarithm rules, \(\log_{10}(xy) = \pm
2\) and so \(xy = 10^2 = 100\)
or \(xy = 10^{-2} =
\frac{1}{100}\).
Since \(x = 4y\), then \(4y^2 = 100\) or \(4y^2 = \frac{1}{100}\), which gives \(y^2 = 25\) or \(y^2 = \frac{1}{400}\).
Since \(y > 0\) (because of the
domain of a logarithm), then \(y = 5\)
or \(y = \frac{1}{20}\).
Since \(x = 4y\), then \(x = 20\) or \(x =
\frac{1}{5}\).
Therefore, \((x,y) = (20, 5)\) or \((\frac{1}{5}, \frac{1}{20})\).
Solution 2:
The first equation can be rewritten as \((x
- 4y)^2 = 0\), from which we obtain \(x
- 4y = 0\) or \(x = 4y\).
The second equation can thus be rewritten successively as \[\begin{align*}
(\log_{10}x)^2 + 2(\log_{10}x)(\log_{10}y) + (\log_{10}y)^2 & = 4\\
(\log_{10}4y)^2 + 2(\log_{10}4y)(\log_{10}y) + (\log_{10}y)^2 & =
4\\
(\log_{10}4 + \log_{10}y)^2 + 2(\log_{10}4 + \log_{10}y)(\log_{10}y) +
(\log_{10}y)^2 & = 4\\
(\log_{10}4)^2 + 2(\log_{10}y)(\log_{10}4) + (\log_{10}y)^2 +
2(\log_{10}y)^2 + 2(\log_{10}y)(\log_{10}4) + (\log_{10}y)^2 & = 4\\
4(\log_{10}y)^2 + 4(\log_{10}y)(\log_{10}4) + (\log_{10}4)^2 - 4 & =
0 \\\end{align*}\] Let \(a =
\log_{10}y\) and \(b =
\log_{10}2\). Then \(2b = 2\log_{10}2 =
\log_{10}2^2 = \log_{10}4\).
We can rewrite the last equation above as \[\begin{align*}
4a^2 + 8ab + 4b^2 - 4 & = 0 \\
a^2 + 2ab +b^2 & = 1\\
(a+b)^2 & = 1 \end{align*}\] and so \(a + b = -1\) or \(a + b = 1\)
Thus, \(\log_{10}y + \log_{10}2 = -1\)
or \(\log_{10}y + \log_{10}2 = 1\),
which simplify to give \(\log_{10}2y =
-1\) or \(\log_{10}2y =
1\).
This means that \(2y = \frac{1}{10}\)
or \(2y = 10\), and so \(y = \frac{1}{20}\) or \(y = 5\).
Since \(x = 4y\), then \((x,y) = (20, 5)\) or \((\frac{1}{5}, \frac{1}{20})\).
Solution 3:
The first equation can be rewritten as \((x
- 4y)^2 = 0\), from which we obtain \(x
- 4y = 0\) or \(x = 4y\).
The second equation can thus be rewritten successively as \[\begin{align*}
(\log_{10}x)^2 + 2(\log_{10}x)(\log_{10}y) + (\log_{10}y)^2 & = 4\\
(\log_{10}4y)^2 + 2(\log_{10}4y)(\log_{10}y) + (\log_{10}y)^2 & =
4\\
(\log_{10}4 + \log_{10}y)^2 + 2(\log_{10}4 + \log_{10}y)(\log_{10}y) +
(\log_{10}y)^2 & = 4\\
(\log_{10}4)^2 + 2(\log_{10}y)(\log_{10}4) + (\log_{10}y)^2 +
2(\log_{10}y)^2 + 2(\log_{10}y)(\log_{10}4) + (\log_{10}y)^2 & = 4\\
4(\log_{10}y)^2 + 4(\log_{10}y)(\log_{10}4) + (\log_{10}4)^2 - 4 & =
0 \\\end{align*}\] Let \(c =
\log_{10}y\) and \(d =
\log_{10}4\). We can rewrite the last equation above as \[\begin{align*}
4c^2 + 4cd + d^2 - 4 & = 0 \\
4c^2 + 4cd + d^2 & = 4 \\
(2c+d)^2 & = 4\end{align*}\] and so \(2c + d = -2\) or \(2c + d = 2\)
Thus, \(2\log_{10}y + \log_{10}4 = -2\)
or \(2\log_{10}y + \log_{10}4 =
2\).
These simplify to give \(\log_{10}(4y^2) =
-2\) or \(\log_{10}(4y^2) =
2\).
This means that \(4y^2 =
\frac{1}{100}\) or \(4y^2 =
100\), and so \(y = \pm
\frac{1}{20}\) or \(y = \pm
5\).
Since \(y > 0\) and \(x = 4y\), then \((x,y) = (20, 5)\) or \((\frac{1}{5}, \frac{1}{20})\).
Suppose that the probability that Leilei passes the test is \(a\). This means that the probability that
Leilei fails the test is \(1 -
a\).
Suppose that the probability that Jerome passes the test is \(b\). This means that the probability that
Jerome fails the test is \(1 -
b\).
Suppose that the probability that Farzad passes the test is \(c\). This means that the probability that
Farzad fails the test is \(1 -
c\).
The probability that all three pass the test is thus \(abc\) and the probability that at least one
of them fails is \(1-abc\). We
determine the value of \(abc\).
Since the probability that Leilei passes the test and Jerome fails the
test is \(\dfrac{3}{20}\), then \(a(1-b) = \dfrac{3}{20}\).
Similarly, \(b(1-c) = \dfrac{1}{4}\)
and \(ac = \dfrac{2}{5}\).
From the first equation, \(a =
\dfrac{3}{20(1-b)}\).
From the second equation, \(1 - c =
\dfrac{1}{4b}\) and so \(c = 1 -
\dfrac{1}{4b}\).
Substituting into the third equation, we obtain \[\dfrac{3}{20(1-b)} \left(1 -
\dfrac{1}{4b}\right) = \dfrac{2}{5}\] Since \(1-b \neq 0\) (because \(a(1-b) \neq 0\)), then multiplying by \(20(1-b)\), we obtain \[3\left(1 - \dfrac{1}{4b}\right) = 8(1-b)\]
Since \(b \neq 0\) (because \(b(1-c) \neq 0\)), then multiplying by \(4b\), we obtain \[3(4b - 1) = 32b(1-b)\] Expanding and
simplifying, we obtain successively \[\begin{align*}
12b - 3 & = 32b - 32b^2 \\
32b^2 - 20b - 3 & = 0 \\
(8b + 1)(4b - 3) & = 0\end{align*}\] Therefore, \(b = - \dfrac{1}{8}\) or \(b = \dfrac{3}{4}\). Since \(b > 0\), then \(b = \dfrac{3}{4}\).
Since \(c = 1 - \dfrac{1}{4b}\), then
\(c = 1 - \dfrac{1}{3} =
\dfrac{2}{3}\).
Since \(a = \dfrac{3}{20(1-b)}\), then
\(a = \dfrac{3}{20(1/4)} =
\dfrac{3}{5}\).
The probability that all three pass is \(abc =
\dfrac{3}{5} \cdot \dfrac{3}{4} \cdot \dfrac{2}{3} =
\dfrac{3}{10}\).
Thus, the probability that at least one of them fails is \(1 - abc = \dfrac{7}{10}\).
Suppose that \(m\) is the
four-digit palindrome between \(1001\)
and \(9999\) with digits \(abba\) and \(n\) is the palindrome with digits \(cddc\).
Then \(m = 1000a + 100b + 10b + a = 1001a +
110b\) and, similarly, \(n = 1001c +
110d\).
Since \(m > n\), then \(a \geq c\).
Therefore, \(m - n = 1001a + 110b - 1001c -
110d = 1001(a-c) + 110(b-d)\).
Note that \(m - n\) is a multiple of
\(35\) exactly when \(m - n\) is a multiple of \(5\) and a multiple of \(7\).
Since \((m - n) - 1001(a-c) =
110(b-d)\) and \(110(b-d)\) is a
multiple of \(5\), then \(m - n\) is a multiple of \(5\) exactly when \(1001(a-c)\) is a multiple of \(5\).
Since \(5\) is a prime number and \(1001\) is not a multiple of \(5\), then \(1001(a-c)\) is a multiple of \(5\) exactly when \(a-c\) is a multiple of \(5\).
In other words, \(m-n\) is a multiple
of \(5\) exactly when \(a-c\) is a multiple of \(5\).
Also, since \((m - n) - 110(b-d) =
1001(a-c)\) and \(1001(a-c)\) is
a multiple of \(7\) (because \(1001 = 7 \cdot 143\)), then \(m - n\) is a multiple of \(7\) exactly when \(110(b-d)\) is a multiple of \(7\).
Since \(7\) is a prime number and \(110\) is not a multiple of \(7\), then \(110(b-d)\) is a multiple of \(7\) exactly when \(b-d\) is a multiple of \(7\).
In other words, \(m-n\) is a multiple
of \(7\) exactly when \(b-d\) is a multiple of \(7\).
Putting this all together, \(m-n\) is a
multiple of \(35\) exactly when \(a-c\) is a multiple of \(5\) and \(b-d\) is a multiple of \(7\).
Recall that \(a\), \(b\), \(c\), and \(d\) are digits with \(a \neq 0\) and \(c \neq 0\).
Also, \(m > n\), which means that we
have that either \(a > c\), or we
have that \(a = c\) and \(b > d\).
Since \(a\) and \(c\) are non-zero digits and \(a-c\) is a multiple of \(5\), then \(a-c =
5\) or \(a-c=0\).
If \(a-c=5\), then \((a, c) = (6, 1), (7, 2), (8, 3), (9, 4)\).
There are \(4\) such pairs.
If \(a-c=0\), then \((a, c) = (1, 1), (2, 2), \ldots, (9, 9)\).
There are \(9\) such pairs.
Since \(b\) and \(d\) are digits and \(b-d\) is a multiple of \(7\), then \(b-d=7\) or \(b-d=0\) or \(b-d
= -7\).
If \(b-d = 7\), then \((b, d) = (7, 0), (8, 1), (9, 2)\). There
are \(3\) such pairs.
If \(b-d =0\), then \((b, d) = (0, 0), (1, 1), \ldots, (9, 9)\).
There are \(10\) such pairs.
If \(b-d=-7\), then \((b, d) = (0, 7), (1, 8), (2, 9)\). There
are \(3\) such pairs.
If \(a-c = 5\), then \(m > n\), so \((b, d)\) can be any of the \(16\) pairs listed.
Thus, there are \(4 \cdot 16 = 64\)
possibilities for the pair \((m, n)\)
in this case.
If \(a-c= 0\), then for \(m > n\), we need \(b> d\) and so \(b - d = 7\).
Thus, there are \(9 \cdot 3 = 27\)
possibilities for the pair \((m, n)\)
in this case.
Therefore, there are \(64 + 27 = 91\)
pairs \((m, n)\) for which \(m - n\) is a multiple of \(35\).
Since \(q < r < s < t\)
form an arithmetic sequence, then \(r = q +
d\), \(s = q + 2d\), \(t = q + 3d\) for some real number \(d > 0\), where \(d\) is the common difference of the
sequence.
Now \(x = 1\) is a root of \(p(x)\) exactly when \(p(1) = 0\).
Here, \[p(1) = q - r - s + t = q - (q+d) -
(q+2d) + (q+3d) = 0\] and so \(x=1\) is a root of \(p(x)\).
Solution 1:
Since \(q\), \(r\), \(s\), \(t\)
is an arithmetic sequence with an even number of terms and \(q < r < s < t\), then the average
of the sequence will also be the average of \(r\) and \(s\). (We could use the representation \(q\), \(q+d\), \(q+2d\), \(q+3d\) to see this formally.)
This means that the average, \(19\), is
"halfway" between \(r\) and \(s\).
Thus, we can write \(r = 19 - h\) and
\(s = 19 + h\) for some integer \(h > 0\). (Since \(r\) and \(s\) are integers, then \(h\) is an integer.)
Note that this tells us that \(s - r = (19+h)
- (19-h) = 2h\).
Therefore, \(q = r - 2h = 19 - 3h\) and
\(t = s + 2h = 19 + 3h\).
Therefore, we can write \[p(x) = (19-3h)x^3 -
(19-h)x^2 - (19+h)x + (19+3h)\] Since \(19-3h > 0\) and \(h\) is a positive integer, then \(h \leq 6\), and so \(1 \leq h \leq 6\).
From (a), we know that \(x=1\) is a
root of \(p(x)\), which means that we
can factor \(p(x)\) as \(p(x) = (x-1)(Ax^2 + Bx + C)\) for some
coefficients \(A\), \(B\), \(C\).
Since the coefficient of \(x^3\) in
\(p(x)\) is \(19-3h\), then \(1
\cdot A = 19-3h\) and so \(A =
19-3h\).
Since the constant term in \(p(x)\) is
\(19+3h\), then \((-1)\cdot C = 19+3h\), and so \(C = -(19+3h)\).
So far, we have \[p(x) = (19-3h)x^3 -
(19-h)x^2 - (19+h)x + (19+3h) = (x-1)((19-3h)x^2 + Bx -
(19+3h))\] Comparing coefficients of \(x^2\), we obtain \(-(19-h) = B - (19-3h)\) and so \(B = -2h\).
Therefore, \[p(x) = (19-3h)x^3 - (19-h)x^2 -
(19+h)x + (19+3h) = (x-1)((19-3h)x^2 -(2h)x - (19+3h))\] Now, for
\(p(x)\) to have three rational roots,
the quadratic polynomial \[(19-3h)x^2 -(2h)x
- (19+3h)\] must have two rational roots.
Since the coefficients of this quadratic polynomial are integers, then
for its roots to be rational, its discriminant, \(\Delta\), must be a perfect square.
Here, \[\begin{align*}
\Delta & = (-2h)^2 - 4(19-3h)(-(19+3h)) \\
& = 4(h^2 + (19-3h)(19+3h)) \\
& = 4(h^2 + 361 - 9h^2) \\
& = 4(361 - 8h^2)\end{align*}\] For \(h = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6\), the corresponding
values of \(\Delta\) are \(1412, 1316, 1156, 932, 644, 292\).
The only one of these integers that is a perfect square is \(1156\).
Therefore, it must be the case that \(h =
3\).
In this case, \[p(x) = (x-1)(10x^2 - 6x - 28)
= (x-1)(2x -4)(5x + 7)\] and so the roots of \(p(x)\) are \(x=1\), \(x=2\), and \(x =
-\frac{7}{5}\).
Solution 2:
Suppose the common difference of the sequence is \(d\) so that the polynomial is \(qx^3-(q+d)x^2-(q+2d)x+(q+3d)\).
The average of \(q\), \(r\), \(s\), and \(t\) is \(19\), so \[19 =
\frac{q+r+s+t}{4} =
\frac{q+(q+d)+(q+2d)+(q+3d)}{4}=\frac{4q+6d}{4}\] which can be
simplified to \(2q+3d=38\).
The only positive integer pairs \((q,d)\) that satisfy this equation are
\((1,12)\), \((4,10)\), \((7,8)\), \((10,6)\), \((13,4)\), and \((16,2)\).
This means there are only six possible polynomials, each of which has a
factor of \(x-1\) by part (a). The
table below has the six polynomials, the resulting quadratic after the
factor of \(x-1\) is removed (using
polynomial or synthetic division), and the discriminant \(\Delta\) of this quadratic.
\((q,d)\) | Cubic | Quadratic | \(\Delta\) |
---|---|---|---|
\((1,12)\) | \(x^2-13x^2-25x+37\) | \(x^2-12x-37\) | \(292\) |
\((4,10)\) | \(4x^2-14x^2-24x+34\) | \(4x^2-10x-34\) | \(644\) |
\((7,8)\) | \(7x^2-15x^2-23x+31\) | \(7x^2-8x-31\) | \(932\) |
\((10,6)\) | \(10x^2-16x^2-22x+28\) | \(10x^2-6x-28\) | \(1156\) |
\((13,4)\) | \(13x^2-17x^2-21x+25\) | \(13x^2-4x-25\) | \(1316\) |
\((16,2)\) | \(16x^2-18x^2-20x+22\) | \(16x^2-2x-22\) | \(1412\) |
Of these four discriminants, the only one that is a perfect square is
\(1156=34^2\). Therefore, the only way
for the cubic to have three rational roots is for \((q,d)=(10,6)\) and the cubic to factor as
\((x-1)(10x^2-6x-28)\).
Thus, the roots of the cubic are \(x=1\) and \(x=\dfrac{6\pm\sqrt{1156}}{20}=\dfrac{6\pm
34}{20}\) or \(x=1\), \(x=2\) and \(x=-\dfrac{7}{5}\).
Instead of computing and factoring all six cubic polynomials, we
could instead factor out \((x-1)\)
directly from \(qx^3-(q+d)x^2-(q+2d)x+(q+3d)\) to get \[qx^3-(q+d)x^2-(q+2d)x+(q+3d) =
(x-1)\big(qx^2-dx-(q+3d)\big)\] for all \((q,d)\).
The discriminant of this quadratic is \((-d)^2+4q(q+3d)=d^2+4q^2+12qd\). For the
quadratic to have rational roots, we need \(d^2+4q^2+12qd=k^2\) for some integer \(k\).
Squaring the equation \(2q+3d=38\)
gives \(4q^2+12qd+9d^2=38^2\).
Substituting \(k^2\) for \(d^2+4q^2+12qd\) gives \(k^2+8d^2=38^2\).
We can rearrange to get \(k^2=38^2-8d^2=2^2(19^2-2d^2)\), from which
it follows that \(361-2d^2\) must be a
perfect square.
From earlier, the only possible values of \(d\) are \(12\), \(10\), \(8\), \(6\), \(4\), and \(2\).
Substituting these \(6\) values of
\(d\) into \(361-2d^2\) gives \(73\), \(161\), \(133\), \(289\), \(329\), and \(363\), respectively. Of these values, only
\(289=17^2\) is a perfect square.
We conclude that \(d=6\) and hence
\(q=10\), so the polynomial is \(10x^3-16x^2-22x+28\), which factors as
\(2(x-1)(x-2)(5x+7)\) and has roots
\(x=1\), \(x=2\), and \(x=-\frac{7}{5}\).
Suppose that the arithmetic sequence \(q\), \(r\), \(s\), \(t\)
has an average of \(m\) and a common
difference of \(2n\).
As in (b), \(q = m - 3n\) and \(r = m - n\) and \(s = m + n\) and \(t = m + 3n\).
Since \(q\), \(r\), \(s\), \(t\), and \(n\) are integers, then \(m\) is also an integer.
Again as in (b), \[p(x) = (x-1)((m-3n)x^2 -
(2n)x - (m+3n))\] and \(p(x)\)
has three rational roots exactly when the discriminant, \(\Delta\), of its quadratic factor is a
perfect square.
Here, \[\Delta = (-2n)^2 - 4(m-3n)(-(m+3n)) =
4n^2 + 4m^2 - 36n^2 = 4(m^2 - 8n^2)\] Note that \(\Delta\) is always an integer (because
\(n\) and \(m\) are integers) and is always a multiple
of 4, so, if it is a perfect square, then it is an even perfect
square.
To show that there are at least two arithmetic sequences of positive
integers \(q<r<s<t\) with
common difference \(2n\) for which
\(p(x)\) has three rational roots, we
show that there are always at least two positive integers \(m\) for which \(q\), \(r\), \(s\), and \(t\) are positive integers and for which
\(\Delta = 4(m^2 - 8n^2)\) is a perfect
square.
Since \(\Delta\) is an integer that is
a mutiple of 4, then \(\Delta\) is a
perfect square exactly when \(\Delta =
(2k)^2\) for some positive integer \(k\).
This is true exactly when \(4k^2 = 4(m^2 -
8n^2)\) or \(k^2 = m^2 - 8n^2\)
or \(m^2 - k^2 = 8n^2\).
Therefore, our goal is now to show that, for every positive integer
\(n>3\), there are always at least
two pairs \((m, k)\) of positive
integers for which \(m^2 - k^2 = 8n^2\)
and for which each of \(q\), \(r\), \(s\), and \(t\) is a positive integer. Since \(q<r<s<t\), this latter condition
is equivalent to saying that \(q = m - 3n >
0\) or \(m > 3n\).
Now \(m^2 - k^2 = (m+k)(m-k)\) and
\(8n^2\) always has the following
factorizations: \[8n^2 = 8n^2 \cdot 1 = 4n^2
\cdot 2 = 2n^2 \cdot 4 = n^2 \cdot 8 = 8n \cdot n = 4n \cdot 2n\]
Since \(n > 3\), these are almost
always distinct factorizations. (For what values of \(n\) would this not be true?)
Note that since \(m\) and \(k\) are positive integers, then \(m+k > m-k\); also, since \(n >3\), the six factorizations of \(8n^2\) are listed in each case with the
larger factor first.
Therefore, we can match factors to obtain the following
possibilities:
\(m+k\) | \(m-k\) | \(2m = (m+k)+(m-k)\) | \(m\) | \(k = (m+k) - m\) |
---|---|---|---|---|
\(8n^2\) | \(1\) | \(8n^2 + 1\) | \(\dfrac{8n^2+1}{2}\) | \(\dfrac{8n^2-1}{2}\) |
\(4n^2\) | \(2\) | \(4n^2 + 2\) | \(2n^2+1\) | \(2n^2-1\) |
\(2n^2\) | \(4\) | \(2n^2 + 4\) | \(n^2+2\) | \(n^2-2\) |
\(n^2\) | \(8\) | \(n^2 + 8\) | \(\dfrac{n^2+8}{2}\) | \(\dfrac{n^2-8}{2}\) |
\(8n\) | \(n\) | \(9n\) | \(\dfrac{9n}{2}\) | \(\dfrac{7n}{2}\) |
\(4n\) | \(2n\) | \(6n\) | \(3n\) | \(n\) |
The second and third rows of this table give values of \(m\) and \(k\) that are always integers. Furthermore,
when \(n > 3\), we have \(m = 2n^2 + 1 > 3n\) and \(m = n^2 + 2 > 3n\). (Can you see why?)
Additionally, we also have \(2n^2 + 1 \neq n^2
+ 2\).
Therefore, for every integer \(n >
3\), there are at least two integers \(m\) for which \(\Delta\) is a perfect square, which means
that \(p(x)\) has three rational roots,
as required.
For completeness, we note that \(\Delta
> 0\) in both cases so the quadratic factor has no repeated
roots and also that when \(x=1\) the
value of the quadratic expression \((m-3n)x^2
- (2n)x - (m+3n)\) is \(-8n \neq
0\), so \(x=1\) is not a
repeated root of the cubic. In other words, the three rational roots of
the cubic polynomial \(p(x)\) are
distinct for each of these values of \(n\) and corresponding values of \(m\).
Using the notation given, the sequence \(T(1,1)\), \(T(2,1)\), \(T(2,3)\), \(T(2,2)\) results in a win.
To see why, after \(T(1,1)\), \(T(2,1)\), \(T(2,3)\), each of the corner coins has been
flipped once (so shows T) and each of the side coins has been flipped
twice (so shows H), giving:
The turn \(T(2,2)\) flips each of the side coins again, leaving all coins showing T.
We show that there is no sequence of turns that results in a win,
arguing this by contradiction.
We note that in any sequence of turns, we can assume that each
particular set of three adjacent coins is flipped \(0\) or \(1\) times. This is because any sequence of
flips can have its component flips rearranged without changing the final
orientation of the coins, and flipping a specific set of three adjacent
coins an even number of times is equivalent to not having flipped them
at all and flipping a specific set of three adjacent coins an odd number
of times is equivalent to having flipped them exactly once.
Suppose that there is a sequence of turns that results in a
win.
Since each of the corner coins must be flipped, then the moves \(T(1,1)\), \(T(3,1)\), \(T(3,5)\) were each used once. Each of these
\(3\) moves needs to be used at least
once, and so each must be used exactly \(1\) time.
Using these moves each exactly once gives the following
configuration:
The net result of the remaining moves must be to flip the centre coin
(currently showing H) and to flip each of the other coins an even number
of times.
Of the moves labelled \(A\), \(B\), \(C\), \(D\), \(E\), \(F\), each neighbouring pair of moves must
be both used or neither used in order to ensure that each of the six T’s
around the hexagon remains a T.
Since the given state does not have all T’s, we need to use at least one
of the these moves.
Without loss of generality, say, \(A\)
is used. Then, both \(B\) and \(F\) are used, which means both \(C\) and \(E\) are used, which means that \(D\) is used.
Thus, all \(6\) moves are used, and so
the centre coin is flipped an even number of times, meaning that it
still shows H.
This means that there is no sequence of moves that results in all of the
coins showing T, and so there is no sequence of moves that results in a
win.
In (a), we have shown that the game starting with \(n = 3\) rows can result in a win.
It is also possible to win with \(n=2\)
rows (flip all of the coins and win in \(1\) move).
It is not possible to win with \(n=1\)
row (no coins can be flipped) and, as we saw in (b), it is not possible
to win with \(n=4\) rows.
We show that the game can be won when \(n =
3k\) or \(n = 3k-1\) for every
positive integer \(k\) and cannot be
won when \(n = 3k+1\) for any positive
integer \(k\).
We start by showing that the game can always be won when \(n = 3k\) or \(n =
3k-1\) for some positive integer \(k\).
To begin to understand why this is true, we draw diagrams that show that
the game can be won for \(n = 6\),
\(n = 9\), \(n = 5\), and \(n
= 8\):
Each diagram shows how the coins are divided into sections, each of
which is either a triangle with \(2\)
rows or a triangle with \(3\) rows, and
is either pointing up or pointing down. Since the game is winnable
starting with each of these small triangles in isolation (regardless of
the direction in which the small triangle is pointing) and we can divide
the larger triangle into these smaller disjoint pieces, then the game is
winnable by focussing on each of the smaller triangles individually and
working systematically through them.
The left-hand diagram shows how the game can be won when \(n = 8\), but also shows how the game can be
won when \(n = 5\) since the shapes
covering the coins in the top \(5\)
rows are disjoint from the shapes covering the bottom \(3\) rows and so could be worked through
independently of the bottom \(3\) rows.
Similarly, the right-hand diagram shows why the game can be won both
when \(n = 9\) and when \(n = 6\).
The left-hand diagram shows that the game is winnable for \(n = 3k - 1\) when \(k = 2\) and \(k =
3\). The right-hand diagram shows that the game is winnable for
\(n = 3k\) when \(k = 2\) and \(k =
3\).
Next, we explain how to extend these diagrams to show why the game is
winnable for \(n = 3k-1\) and \(n = 3k\) for every positive integer \(k\).
Each of these diagrams can be extended by repeatedly adding groups of
\(3\) additional rows to the bottom,
with these rows constructed using blocks of the following form added on
the right side of triangle with \(2\)
rows or with \(3\) rows:
Each of these blocks is in the form of a parallelogram \(3\) coins wide and \(3\) coins high. These blocks can be joined
end-to-end to form a larger parallelogram that is \(3k\) coins wide and \(3\) coins high for every positive integer
\(k\).
In the left-hand case (\(n=3k-1\)), we
create the next three rows starting with a triangle with \(2\) rows followed by a parallelogram that
is \(3k\) coins wide and 3 coins high.
This forms \(3\) rows with lengths
\(3k\), \(3k+1\), \(3k+2\), which turns a triangle with \(3k-1\) rows into one with \(3k+2\) rows.
Because the \(n=3k-1\) triangle is
still divided into winnable smaller triangles and the additional 3 rows
are divided into winnable smaller triangles, the game can be won when
\(n = 3k+2\). Note that \(3k + 2 = 3(k+1) - 1\).
This shows that, once we know that the game can be won for \(n = 3k-1\), then we know that the game can
be won for \(n = 3(k+1) - 1 = 3k+2\).
This in turns shows that the game can be won for \(n = 3k - 1\) for every positive integer
\(k\) because we can move one term at a
time moving along the sequence of integers of the form \(3k - 1\). (This argument could be made more
formally using a technique called mathematical induction.)
In other words, this argument allows us to see that the game can be won
when \(n = 2, 5, 8, 11, 14, \ldots\)
and for every positive integer that is 1 less than a multiple of \(3\).
In the right-hand case (\(n=3k\)),
we create the next three rows starting with a triangle with \(3\) rows followed by a parallelogram that
is \(3k\) coins wide and \(3\) coins high. This forms \(3\) rows with lengths \(3k+1\), \(3k+2\), \(3k+3\), which turns a triangle with \(3k\) rows into one with \(3k+3\) rows.
Because the \(n=3k\) triangle is still
divided into winnable smaller triangles and the additional \(3\) rows are divided into winnable smaller
triangles, the game can be won when \(n =
3k+3\). Note that \(3k+3 =
3(k+1)\).
This shows that, once we know that the game can be won for \(n = 3k\), then we know that the game can be
won for \(n = 3(k+1)= 3k+3\). This in
turns shows that the game can be won for \(n =
3k\) for every positive integer \(k\).
In other words, this argument allows us to see that the game can be won
when \(n = 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, \ldots\)
and for every positive integer that is a multiple of \(3\).
Thus, we have shown the game can be won when \(n = 3k\) or \(n = 3k-1\) for every positive integer \(k\).
Consider now the case of \(n = 3k+1\).
In this diagram, starting in a triangle with \(7\) rows, we have numbered every coin \(1\), \(2\)
or \(3\) by labelling the leftmost coin
in the rows with \(1\), \(2\), \(3\), \(1\), \(2\), \(3\), and so on, with the coins across each
row numbered cyclically \(1\), \(2\), \(3\).
With this labelling, each group of three mutually adjacent coins
includes a \(1\), a \(2\), and a \(3\). This is because (i) the two of the
three coins in the same row have different labels and (ii) if the third
coin is in the row above, it is one coin before the leftmost coin in the
1/2/3 cycle, or if the third coin is in the row below, it is one coin
after the rightmost coin in the 1/2/3 cycle.
A triangle with \(n = 3k+1\) rows will
always include \(1\) additional coin
labelled \(1\) compared to the numbers
of coins labelled \(2\)s and \(3\)s. This is true because it is true for
\(n=1\). Then for \(n = 4\) and \(n =
7\) and so on, when we add the additional set of three rows, we
add an equal number of \(1\)s, \(2\)s and \(3\)s, because each additional \(3\) rows can be decomposed into one
triangle with \(2\) rows on the bottom
left followed by "south-east" diagonal lines each containing \(1\), \(2\)
and \(3\).
When \(n = 3k+1\), the total number of
coins is \[C = \dfrac{(3k+1)(3k+2)}{2} =
\dfrac{9k^2 + 9k + 2}{2} = 9\left(\dfrac{k^2+k}{2}\right) + 1\]
We let \(t = \dfrac{k^2+k}{2}\). Since
\(k^2 + k = k(k+1)\) is always even
(since one of its factors is even), then \(t\) is an integer.
Note that \(C = 9t + 1\) is \(1\) more than a multiple of \(9\).
This means that the number of 1s is \(3t +
1\), the number of 2s is \(3t\),
and the number of 3s is \(3t\).
This means that the sum of the labels on the \(C = 9t+1\) coins is \[(1 + 2 + 3) \cdot 3t + 1 \cdot 1 = 18t +
1\] Next, we add a \(+\) sign to
the label on every coin that shows H, and a \(-\) sign to the label of every coin that
shows T.
Before any moves are made, the total is \(18t
+ 1\) since all coins show H.
If we were to get to a position where all of the coins showed T, the
total would be \(-18t - 1\).
The difference in these totals is \((18t+1)-(-18t-1) = 36t + 2\) which is an
even number which is not a multiple of \(4\). We will see shortly why this is
important.
Now, we determine the amount by which the total of the visible labels
changes for the \(8\) possible
combinations of \(+\) and \(-\) on a set of three mutually adjacent
coins that are flipped:
Coins with labels \(+1+2+3\) become \(-1-2-3\): change of \(-6 - 6= -12\)
Coins with labels \(+1+2-3\) become \(-1-2+3\): change of \(0 - 0 =0\)
Coins with labels \(+1-2+3\) become \(-1+2-3\): change of \(-2 - 2 = -4\)
Coins with labels \(+1-2-3\) become \(-1+2+3\): change of \(4 - (-4) = 8\)
Coins with labels \(-1+2+3\) become \(+1-2-3\): change of \((-4) - 4 = -8\)
Coins with labels \(-1+2-3\) become \(+1-2+3\): change of \(2 - (-2) = 4\)
Coins with labels \(-1-2+3\) become \(+1+2-3\): change of \(0 - 0 = 0\)
Coins with labels \(-1-2-3\) become \(+1+2+3\): change of \(6 - (-6) = 12\)
In each case, the change is a multiple of \(4\).
This means that we cannot achieve a final total change of \(36t + 2\), which means that we cannot end
up in a situation where all of the coins show T, which means that the
game cannot be won when \(n =
3k+1\).
In summary, the game can be won when \(n = 3k\) or \(n = 3k-1\) for every positive integer \(k\) and cannot be won when \(n = 3k+1\) for any positive integer \(k\).