Our computation of in
Problem 1(a) above gives us some hints as to how to prove this result.
Let’s pay close attention to this situation first before embarking on
the general proof.
In the solution to 1(a) we arrived at the expression The number of s in the first set of parentheses is the
number of sublists of
of length that contain . There is only one such list, namely
.
The number of s in the second
set of parentheses is the number of sublists of of length that contain . Every such list is of the form , where . There are ways to choose an
element from , so there are four sublists
of length that contain .
There are six s in the third
set of parentheses. This is the number of sublists of of length that contain . Every such sublist is of the form
where and and belong to the set . The number of ways we can
choose two distinct elements and
from is precisely the binomial
coefficient .
Similarly, there are four s in
the fourth set of parentheses because there are ways to select three
elements from to create a sublist of length .
Finally there is way to choose four elements from to create a list of length
containing , which is the list .
Notice that the third set of parentheses is negated, and all the
others are left as they are. Let’s look at this a little more closely.
Here is what the 3-sign sum of
lists containing a look like, for
lists of length , , , , and respectively: The
only time the appears negated is
when computing the 3-sign sum of a
list of length .
Great! Let’s look at the general case now. We wish to relate to . We can split up the computation of
into summing up the -sign sums of sublists of that contain , and those that do not contain .
The sum of all the where
is not in is simply summing up for a sublist of , which is precisely . Therefore we can write where is the sum of all -sign sums of sublists that contain
. Let’s look at an arbitrary
term from the sum . For what
follows, we must allow the empty list to be a sublist of to be a sublist, and we
define .
A sublist of length that
contains is of the form where
is a
sublist of . So Observe that is the
3-sign sum of a sublist of .
Every sublist of that contains gives rise to a sublist of by removing from the list. Furthermore, every
sublist of gives
rise to a sublist of containing by simply appending on to the end of the list. Therefore,
when computing the sum of all -sign sums of sublists of containing , we are left with the sum of all
3-sign sums of sublists of plus some number of s. More formally we have for some integer . To figure out the value of , we must pay attention to the length of
each sublist. Sublists of containing with length a multiple of three
contribute to the value of , and sublists of containing whose length is not a multiple of
three contribute . So, in order
to figure out what is, we must
count the number of sublists containing of each length.
The number of sublists of of length containing is equal to the number of sublists of
of length . The number of sublists of of length is the binomial coefficient . To write down an
expression for , we must first
introduce the integer . Let
be an integer and define Let be the
number of sublists of of length that contain . Then But from our discussion
above we have .
Therefore, Putting all of this
together we have completing the
proof.