Subtract the first equation from the second, rearrange the
resulting expression and then factor to obtain Therefore, or . If , then substituting into the first
equation and solving we obtain that . If , then substituting into the first
equation and solving we obtain . Therefore, the solutions
are and .
Solution 1
We are asked for the value of
the midpoint of zeros, which is the value of the vertex of the parabola.
The equation is written in vertex form already and so .
Solution 2
Find the -intercepts: Thus, or . Thus, .
Consider and and find the intersection point of
the resulting equations,
and . Subtracting the
equations we obtain .
Therefore, and so
the intersection point is .
Now substitute
into the general equation. Therefore, Since
satisfies the general equation, it is a point on all of the
parabolas.
Now and so the
vertex is at , . If we represent the coordinates
of the vertex by , we have and or , the required parabola.
Completing the square we obtain and so we see that
the vertex of this parabola is ,
the common point found in part (a)
Factoring both equations we arrive at:
From equation we can see neither of the factors of its left-hand
side are . Dividing by
gives . Substituting this
relation back into we get Therefore, or . Hence or .
We assume, on the contrary, that the coefficients are in
geometric sequence. Then which implies
that . But now the
discriminant , so
that the roots are not real. Thus, we have a contradiction to the
condition set out in the statement of the problem and our assumption is
false.
Let and be the integer roots. The equation can
be written as with and . Since are in arithmetic sequence, we have
Ignoring the order of the factors, we can factor 3 as a product of
two integers in two ways: or
. Therefore, the two
possibilities for the roots of quadratic are: (i) and or (ii) and .
Solution 1
Multiplying out and collecting terms results in . We look for a
factoring with integer coefficients, using the fact that the first and
last coefficients are 1 and ,
respectively. So
where and are undetermined coefficients. However,
expanding and comparing coefficients gives and and . Since all three equations are
satisfied by and , we have factored the original
expression as
Factoring these two quadratics gives the roots and .
Solution 2
We observe that the original equation is of the form , where . Now if we can find such that , then . So we solve which gives the first
factor above. With
polynomial division, we can then determine that
and continue as in Solution 1.
The vertex has and and so . When we get which factors to give us
intercepts at and 6. The larger
value is 6, and so .
Therefore, we want the line through and . Finding the slope of the line and
using the second point, the equation of the line is
which simplifies to .
Solution 1
Multiplying gives The roots are Thus,
or .
Solution 2
Observe that is one
solution. Rearranging as in the first solution we get Using the sum (or
the product) of the roots, we determine that other root is .
Since is a solution of
, we know that is a factor of . Factoring (or using long
division) we obtain Thus, the roots are , and .
Let the roots be and . Using the sum of the roots and the
product of the roots we obtain and Then
It appears that
the minimum value should be at the vertex of the parabola , that is, at
(found by
completing the square). But we have ignored the condition that the roots
are real. The discriminant of the original equation is Thus, we have real roots only
when or . Therefore, cannot be our final
answer, since the roots are not real for this value. However is a parabola
opening up and is symmetrical about its axis of symmetry . So we move to the
nearest value of to the axis of
symmetry that gives real roots, which is .
Let . Since and are inverse functions, we know that
. We need to solve Thus, .
Complete the square to obtain The vertex is at which we know is . Therefore, solving we obtain
and .
Using the sum and the product of the roots we have the four
equations:
Therefore, But none of , ,
or are zero, so . Then we get . Substituting into we get . Then . Thus, .
The most common way to do this problem uses calculus. However, we
make the substitution . To get
in terms of , try
Therefore, the value we want to minimize is .
If we now let , we
have the parabola which
opens up and has its minimum at with minimum value of . Note that since can assume any real value except , we know that and will assume all real values except
zero. Thus, the minimum value of this expression is .
Solution 1
Since the function is linear
and has positive slope, it is one-to-one and so it is invertible.
This means that
for every real number and for every real number
.
Therefore, for every real number .
This means that Furthermore, if , then . Therefore,Since , we have and so .
Therefore,and so .
Solution 2
Since the function is linear
and has positive slope, it is one-to-one and so it is invertible.
To find a formula for ,
we start with the equation , convert to and then solve for to obtain and so .
We are given that .
We can apply the function
to both sides successively to obtain
We want to determine the value of .
Thus, we can replace with , which is equivalent to replacing
with .
Thus, .