We have which implies
that . Therefore, .
Since it
follows that The graphs of and intersect only at and . (Since only for .) Therefore, is the only solution.
This expression equals .
For the first equation we know that . The second equation states
which gives us after cubing both sides.
Since neither side of this new equation is we can divide the first equation by
this new equation to eliminate .
Therefore, .
Solution 1
We express the logarithms in exponential form to arrive at: and . Thus, Thus, . Therefore, the
point of intersection is .
Solution 2
Substituting one equation into the other we obtain Therefore, . Substituting this value
back into either of the original equations and we obtain that . Therefore, the point of
intersection is .
We note first that for
all points on the curve. The midpoint of is given by ,. Since we draw a
horizontal line through the midpoint, , we have that
Given that the graph of the function passes through , we know that . We have and . Since neither side of the
first equation is 0, we can divide the second equation by the first to
obtain . Therefore, .
Factoring both sides of the equation gives Since and are integers, and the only integer
power of 2 that is also an integer power of 3 is the number , we have and .
If , then .
Observe that the argument of both logarithms must be positive and
so . Now However, since , we have that .
If is a geometric
sequence, then . It follows
that
which implies . Therefore, the logarithms form an arithmetic
sequence.
If
form an arithmetic sequence, then Thus, form a geometric sequence.
Using exponent rules and arithmetic, we manipulate the given
equation: Since the two
expressions are equal and the bases are equal, then the exponents must
be equal, and so .
Let . Then
becomes .
Taking the base logarithm of
both sides and using the fact that , we obtain
or
. Therefore,
and so .
If ,
then and so
.
If ,
then and so . Therefore, or .
Note that since
cannot be the base of a
logarithm. This tells us that .
Using the fact that and then using other logarithm laws, we
obtain the following equivalent equations:
Letting and
noting that since , we obtain the following
equations equivalent to the previous ones: Therefore, the original
equation is equivalent to or .
Converting back to the variable , we obtain or , which gives or .